| Author |
Message |
Deckard
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Oct 05, 2005 12:30 pm Post subject:
Push or Pull ? Your experience ... |
|
|
Hi,
I would like to know what type of configuration is usually done between
a coder and a first PP to receive the coder stream. What is the most
used mode between them ? Pull or Push ?
In Push mode, if the PP suddenly stops, the coder stops with some
errors. Which is a problem for me.
In Pull mode, both are "independent". If the coder stops, the PP not. If
the PP stops, the coder not. Which I prefer.
In both mode, the player will or not be able to resume the stream playback.
I need to produce a stream with a coder, send it to a first PP and then
dispatch it to several PP.
I want the live stream to be the most available as possible. Do I need
to use several coders ?
Before starting, and after have read MS documentation, I need now some
experience return of "real" cases.
What is the state-of-art of WM streaming ?
Thanks.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Lowery
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:30 am Post subject:
Re: Push or Pull ? Your experience ... |
|
|
"Deckard" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:4343990e$0$31844$636a15ce@news.free.fr...
| Quote: | Hi,
I would like to know what type of configuration is usually done between a
coder and a first PP to receive the coder stream. What is the most used mode
between them ? Pull or Push ?
In Push mode, if the PP suddenly stops, the coder stops with some errors.
Which is a problem for me.
In Pull mode, both are "independent". If the coder stops, the PP not. If the
PP stops, the coder not. Which I prefer.
In both mode, the player will or not be able to resume the stream playback.
I need to produce a stream with a coder, send it to a first PP and then
dispatch it to several PP.
I want the live stream to be the most available as possible. Do I need to use
several coders ?
Before starting, and after have read MS documentation, I need now some
experience return of "real" cases.
What is the state-of-art of WM streaming ?
|
Unicast or multicast PPs? Why would your server PP "suddenly stop?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deckard
Guest
|
Posted:
Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:30 am Post subject:
Re: Push or Pull ? Your experience ... |
|
|
| Quote: |
Unicast or multicast PPs? Why would your server PP "suddenly stop?"
|
I don't know what is the most appropriate mode for distribution servers.
I wanted to know what happens when the PP stops. So I stop it.
I don't know what could happen on the server but I have to worry about
all the error cases.
Thank you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Lowery
Guest
|
Posted:
Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:34 pm Post subject:
Re: Push or Pull ? Your experience ... |
|
|
"Deckard" <someone@somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:43461587$0$20840$636a55ce@news.free.fr...
| Quote: |
Unicast or multicast PPs? Why would your server PP "suddenly stop?"
I don't know what is the most appropriate mode for distribution servers.
I wanted to know what happens when the PP stops. So I stop it.
I don't know what could happen on the server but I have to worry about all the
error cases.
|
For distribution servers you're stuck with using either RTSPU (UDP) or RTSPT
(TCP). The latter is probably best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|